Excerpt
Cameron J. Davis, 32° KCCH
Fraternally,
Cameron J. Davis, 32° KCCH
European Representative
Valley of Columbus, Ga.
colkm@gascottishrite.org
President
AMSRB-NATO e.V.
Valley of Washington, DC
cameron.davis@amsrb-nato.com
European Representative
Comments
Dear Brethren,
In the teachings of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, the 30th Degree, known as "Knight Kadosh," reminds Masons of life's impermanence and the inevitability of loss. This degree, often titled "Knight of the White and Black Eagle," serves as a solemn meditation on duty, mortality, and honor. It challenges Masons to reflect on the fleeting nature of life and the enduring bonds that connect us to our brethren. Central to its message is the call to honor those who have passed, to cherish the fellowship we share, and to support one another both in life and beyond.
On January 21, 2025, the American Canadian Grand Lodge and the Masonic world experienced a profound loss with the passing of Most Worshipful Brother Paul Michael Curran, Past Grand Master and sitting Grand Secretary. At 66 years old, MW Bro. Curran succumbed to the effects of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a diagnosis that came far too late and tragically accelerated his departure. His passing is not only a loss for his family but also for the fraternity he served so diligently for over 25 years.
MW Bro. Paul’s Masonic journey began 25 years ago, marked by steadfast commitment, leadership, and love for the Craft. He rose through the ranks of the American Canadian Grand Lodge, serving in multiple roles that showcased his dedication to Freemasonry’s principles. His leadership as a Grand Master earned him the respect of Masons across jurisdictions, and his continued service as Grand Secretary demonstrated his unwavering commitment to the governance and preservation of Masonic traditions.
Known for his unwavering candor and firm leadership, MW Bro. Paul was much more than a titleholder. To many, he was a mentor, a friend, and a true guardian of Masonic heritage. His words, often direct and unflinching, carried with them a wisdom that inspired those privileged to work alongside him. He believed in pushing his brethren to be their best and expected nothing less of himself.
As a 33° Scottish Rite Mason, Illustrious Bro. Paul exemplified the values of the higher degrees. His work with the AMSRB-NATO Club within the Valley of Washington, D.C., as Club Treasurer reflected his outstanding organizational prowess. He was a man who brought together people of different walks of life, to accomplish the hard tasks at hand while creating lasting bonds of brotherhood that transcended borders and differences.
One of Illustrious Sir Paul’s greatest joys was his work with the Shriners. As a Past Potentate of Emirat Shriners and its Temple Recorder, he was deeply committed to the Shriners Hospitals for Children. His dedication to the Shriners’ mission to provide medical care to children in need was unmatched. While his exterior was often marked by a strong, no-nonsense demeanor, it would soften the moment anyone mentioned the children served by the Shriners. His love and compassion for the “Kids,” as he lovingly called them, were evident in every event and conversation.
His passion for this cause became a defining feature of his Masonic legacy. He often remarked that the opportunity to change even one child’s life for the better was worth all the effort. Whether organizing events, rallying support for our Transportation Fund, or simply sharing the Shriners’ story, Ill. Sir Paul’s enthusiasm was infectious. To many, he was not just a leader but an embodiment of the Shriners’ mission.
MW Bro. Paul’s impact extended beyond titles and roles. To his brethren, he was a beacon of strength, an advocate for tradition, and a source of wisdom. While his “tough love” approach occasionally ruffled feathers, it was always delivered with the intent to elevate others. He believed in the transformative power of Freemasonry and worked tirelessly to ensure that its principles were not only preserved but also practiced.
The lessons of the 30th Degree remind us that mortality is a shared journey, one that binds us all in our shared humanity. MW Bro. Paul’s passing challenges us to reflect on how we honor those who have left us. His life was a testament to the enduring bonds of brotherhood, the strength of duty, and the power of living a life dedicated to others.
As we mourn the loss of a brother, mentor, and friend, we also celebrate the legacy he leaves behind. His example challenges us to be better Masons, better friends, and better people. He showed us that the values of Freemasonry are not just ideals to strive for—they are principles to live by.
Let MW Bro. Paul’s life be a call to action for all who knew him. Let us honor his memory by continuing the work he was so passionate about. Let us carry forward his dedication to brotherly love, relief, and truth. And let us remember that, though his physical presence is gone, his legacy lives on in the lives he touched and the lessons he taught.
In the words of the Knight Kadosh, we are reminded that death is not the end—it is a passage. While we grieve, we find comfort in knowing that MW Bro. Paul Curran’s journey continues, and his spirit endures in the bonds of fellowship he so deeply cherished. May his memory be eternal, and may we, his brethren, strive to honor his legacy in all we do.
Rest in peace, Brother. You will be missed but never forgotten.
College of Freemasonry
Introduction to "The Knight Kadosh" by Tarik Eker, 32°
Cameron J. Davis, 30 January 2025The College of Freemasonry lecture in this issue of The Ashlar by Tarik Eker, 32° explores the 30th degree of the Scottish Rite, known as the Knight Kadosh, a title that translates to "Holy Knight" in Hebrew. He explains how this degree has deep symbolic meaning, reflecting a journey toward moral enlightenment, knowledge, and virtue.
Brother Tarik begins by explaining the term Kadosh, which comes from Hebrew words meaning "holy" or "set apart." He then delves into the historical and philosophical background of this degree, linking it to the downfall of the Knights Templar and their leader, Jacques de Molay. The degree is sometimes misunderstood as one of vengeance, but Brother Tarik argues that its true purpose is to uphold justice and the freedom of conscience.
A key symbol in this lecture is the "Mystic Ladder," which represents the journey from ignorance to knowledge and ultimately to virtue. Brother Tarik emphasizes that this journey is not just about studying books but about deeply understanding and applying philosophy in life. He explores how philosophy—described as the love of wisdom—connects to this Masonic path, examining its role in shaping moral character and guiding actions.
The lecture is a call to self-reflection and intellectual growth, urging Masons to strive for wisdom and virtue rather than revenge or blind obedience. It highlights the idea that true justice is achieved through knowledge, ethical conduct, and the defense of personal freedoms.
The Knight Kadosh
The Knight Kadosh
by Tarik Eker, 32°, published 18 November 2018, digitally published for the Ashlar on 1 February 2025The subject of this article, titled simply as The Knight Kadosh, contains my personal philosophical reflection on the 30th Degree.
First of all, I would like to explain the term Kadosh (Kadash and Kodesh) in more detail. The former comes from the Hebrew קָדֹוש (kah-dochsh), an adjective, meaning holy, sanctified, and in older writings (by G. Campbell) also referred to as purified. The root word Kadash is a verb in Hebrew and means, among other things, to sanctify, to demarcate, to consecrate and to commit oneself. The latter, Kodesh, is not to be confused with Kadesh (a biblical place), is a masculine for holiness, and is used in Hebrew to distinguish from something sacred to the simple and profane.
Knight Kadosch is also called "Chevalier de l'Aigle blanc et noir", "Knight of the White and Black Eagle". Whereby the esoteric philosophical meaning of this knightly degree lies below this term, because the designation is not rather the Holy Knights but the chosen ones, the Elus. And here, under the Mystical Ladder, the concept of "ne plus ultra", the highest, becomes clear. I will go into more detail about this in the course of my article.
Provocatively, I would like to make it clear that although this degree in its literary work represents a clear kind of revenge (or also called "degree of revenge") and a retribution or a commitment to the struggle against the throne and altar (of the Church), it is nevertheless a false assumption, because the "only retribution" that the Freemasons can exert in the name of all persecuted then and still today, lies in the work of bringing about a moral condition so that all recent attacks on freedom of conscience are made more difficult.
Further, in this degree, I hear, the legend of Hiram is replaced by Jacobus Burgundus Molay, and thus also the last degree of the Chosen Knight (Elus) is told. In retrospect, this degree symbolizes the downfall of the Templars and the victory over freedom of conscience, according to Lennhoff in the Masonic Lexicon.
But how does one attain this freedom of conscience? It can only be attained through knowledge in the sciences, the "Holy Books" and through the acquisition of the virtues. This is exactly what "Mystic Ladder" symbolizes, but it has been adapted and modernized by time. Therefore, I do not want to deal with individual seven to seven rungs of the leader, but I do want to devote my attention to the basic idea of the Mystic Leader.
So I went on a quest to describe the terms, ignorance, knowledge and virtue in more detail. I didn't reach for an encyclopedia, but rather tried to understand the differences and similarities. Well, the more I searched, the more I found myself on a path that I knew, but it was clear that I did not know the path I knew. I don't want to test your patience any longer, my brethren, with terminology, it's philosophy...
Yes, philosophy, my brethren, for truly this concept (Φιλοσοφiα, love of wisdom, philosophia) is the universal science, the supreme principles and at the same time the doctrine of world view, i.e., the science of the "principles" (presuppositions, foundations) of knowledge, cognition, being, and action, and at the same time the attempt (always to be renewed) of a comprehensive synthesis of the general results of thought and the sciences into a unified and Outlook.
In more detail, the specific object of critical philosophy is above all the basic concepts and principles of all cognition, which are examined and evaluated for their source, their validity, their truth and reality content, their contribution to knowledge. Philosophy does not go directly to the "supersensible" or "transcendent", but to the presuppositions and conditions of the stock of the empirical world of facts contained in experience and in the sciences, whose uniform, fundamental, universal conceptuality is strived for. Philosophy is an analytical-synthetic and critical-evaluative science, it is based on experience, but rises independently to the ("a priori", "transcendental") conditions of possible experience in general; thus it becomes a science theory, the self-consciousness of knowledge, its foundations and methods.
But philosophy also examines the presuppositions of correct action (volition and evaluation), it is the supreme science of value and purpose, not only the doctrine of cognition and being, but also of ought, of the highest norms. It examines the results of the sciences on the basis of the presuppositions found and proven in epistemological criticism, and thus — with the help of "speculative" imagination — it arrives at the connection between the various sides of reality as "critical metaphysics". Philosophy interacts with life and the individual sciences; as it is influenced by both, it constantly – directly or indirectly – has an effect on them and is thus a powerful cultural factor.
Philosophy is divided into theoretical and practical (or "poietic"), pure and applied, philosophy of nature and philosophy of mind (philosophy of culture), epistemology and doctrine of principles. The philosophical disciplines are: logic and epistemology, metaphysics, cosmology, philos. Psychology, Ethics along with Philosophy of Law, Social, History, Aesthetics and Philosophy of Religion.
Philosophy, which has emerged from myth, partly in opposition to it, and from which most of the individual sciences have only gradually detached themselves, has long appeared as a universal science. Originally, the pursuit of knowledge means for its own sake (Herodotus and Thucydides). As a striving for knowledge, philosophy appears in Socrates, also in Plato, according to whom the philosopher stands in the middle between the ignorant and the absolutely knowing. Philosophy is the acquisition of knowledge; at its highest level it is "dialectics", a theory of ideas, which is at the same time a universal science of being. This is especially true according to Aristotle: the "first philosophy" is the science of existence as such and the "principles" of things.
According to this, philosophy is divided into theoretical (physics, mathematics, logic, rhetoric, "theology" or "first philosophy"), practical (ethics, politics, economics) and poietic philosophy (aesthetics, philosophy of art). Philosophy takes a turn to the practical in the Stoics (striving for virtue and wisdom; Cicero, Seneca) and Epicureans (striving for happiness), also among the Neoplatonists, who at the same time make them theosophical.
In more recent times, philosophy has emerged as a conceptual, abstract science — less emancipating itself from theology — which deals in particular with God, the world, the soul, man and his actions, and seeks out and discusses the ultimate reasons for the given (as in Descartes, F. Bacon and Hobbes). According to Christian Wolff, it is "a science of all kinds of things, how and why they are possible".
The philosophy of Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and especially Kant, who contrasts dogmatism with criticism, is based on epistemology. According to him, philosophy is a priori knowledge of reason from mere concepts, the science of the presuppositions and conditions of cognition and action, and at the same time the "system of philosophical knowledge" (like transcendental philosophy, metaphysics). This is the "school concept" of philosophy. According to its "concept of the world" it is "the science of the relation of all knowledge to the essential purposes of human reason". The philosopher appears as the "lawgiver of human reason", as a "teacher in the ideal". The "pure" philosophy is "knowledge from pure reason", the "empirical" philosophy is "knowledge of reason from empirical principles". The "philosophy of nature" applies to everything that exists, the "philosophy of morals" to what should be there.
For Fichte, philosophy becomes the "science theory", the "knowledge that sees itself becoming", the "genetic knowledge" or the "knowledge of the whole of knowledge". According to Schelling, it is "absolute science", "science of the absolute", knowledge of things as they are in reason. Hegel also defines it as the "science of the absolute"; formally it is "thinking contemplation of objects". It is "the thinking idea, the knowing truth." It has to comprehend what is, the "timeless comprehension" of things (like natural philosophy). Their method is dialectics — According to Schopenhauer, philosophy is "science in concepts" whose task is "to repeat the whole essence of the world abstractly, generally, and clearly in concepts" (the world as will and representation). It is a "middle ground between art and science, or rather something that unites both" — According to Herbart, philosophy is the science of the "processing of concepts."
As a critique of knowledge or as a science of the principles of knowledge and action (of culture in general), philosophy is mainly determined by the "neo-Kantians". According to Riehl, it is "general scientific and practical wisdom teachings", and above all the "art of spiritual guidance". According to H. Cohen, it has the task of bringing science itself and culture to an understanding of its presuppositions."
As a general science of value of a critical-normative nature, the philosophers define Windelban ("critical science of universally valid values", "science of the principles of absolute judgment"), Rickert, J. Cohn and others — According to Nietzsche, the philosopher as legislator determines the "hierarchy of values".
In the history of philosophy is both the development of philosophical thought itself and the presentation of this development, of the teachings of philosophers, of their attempts to solve philosophical problems. The history of philosophy pursues the formulation and solution of problems, the development of the hypotheses and theories of philosophy, partly by itself, partly as elements of the world and life views of the thinkers of all times; these views depend in part on the character of the thinkers, on their nationality, their social environment, on the cultural situation, on historical traditions, but in addition to the psychological, social and cultural moments, there are above all purely logical motives and tendencies, some of which come to the fore over longer periods, and some of which reappear again and again in the course of time and in the competition of ideas with each other until the problems in question have been resolved as far as possible. In this respect, however, the process of philosophy and history is never completed, but is geared towards an ideal goal, which is always only approximately achieved, even if in the end full clarity and definiteness arises over the foundations and presuppositions of all philosophizing and cognition (as under criticism). In the history of philosophy, the will to comprehend and justify in a uniform way has been pursued by all kinds of detours and byways, with ever new approaches, as the realizer of the "idea", the reason immanent in all thinking, the principles of which gradually come to consciousness.
And it is precisely this awareness that forms the foundation of our Mystical Ladder.
Vol. 4, No. 2 - February 2025